I’m listening to Confidence Man📚, read in a defiantly flat narrative style by author Maggie Haberman. Even more than other accounts of the Trump presidency–and I’ve read a few–it’s a shocking reminder of just how many outrages were committed by the 45th president. When the book came out, there was lots of discussion about whether it was kosher for Haberman to hold back some revelations for the book rather than reporting them as she learned them in the New York Times, which employs her, since they could have changed the changed the way some people voted. (My take: Apart from any considerations of news value, it’s part of the informal contract with your employer that if something happens on your beat while you’re employed by a newspaper, you have to write about it–or share that information with a colleague who’ll write about it. Presumably, Haberman and all these other journalist-authors make agreements with their Times editors when they sign book contracts.)
Three-quarters into the book, that question feels like a barely relevant abstraction. Nothing that was held back by Haberman or by any of the other journalists whose books about Trump I’ve read would’ve made the slightest bit of difference to the outcome of the 2020 election. There were so many affronts to decency reported on and covered extensively every single day of the administration that if you believe in the rule of law and the institutions of government, there really shouldn’t have been a moment’s doubt about whether Trump was suitable for office.
As I mentioned before, Haberman doesn’t bring much variety to her narration. At first that bugged me a bit, but it’s perfect for a book with a lot of quotations from Trump. Absent his blustery style of speech, Trump’s words reveal the emptiness where empathy and consideration for others should be.